[Real-time] Women did not hear that uniform uniforms were detained when they left the service.

When I first entered the company, I did not hear that I had to purchase uniforms. When I left the company, I was told that I would deduct 80% of the overall cost of the overalls. This deduction was more than 900 yuan.

The day before yesterday, Xiaochen posted his experience on the East Forum. “A month's wages also cost 3,000 yuan and some people were deducted 1,200 yuan. Nearly half of them were gone...” Yesterday, the reporter interviewed To Chen.

The former employee is very upset

Less than one year after taking office

The company deducted her more than 900 yuan clothing fee

From July to September last year, Xiao Chen practiced in a company in Chenzhou. After the September turning point, the company said that it was necessary to equip uniforms and the clothing was divided into two sets of summer and winter clothing, for a total of 1,500 yuan, because at that time it was autumn and Xiaochen only Made a set of winter clothes worth 1,130 yuan.

"Winter clothes are a suit jacket, two shirts, a skirt, a pair of pants, a tie, and on such things, I think it is expensive for 1,130 yuan." Chen said, at first, it was tailor-made, but later It was found that the factory only came to the company to measure the size of its employees. It then issued S, M, and L coded finished uniforms according to the size, and there were no trademarks for the clothes.

Originally did not expect to charge, Chen will also wear, until recently put forward to leave the job, she was asked to fill out a departure slip, stated above, in the settlement of wages need to deduct 80% of clothing production costs.

“I later asked if I had understood that if I received the uniform and left the service within half a year, I would deduct 80% of the cost; if I left the collar for less than a year, the ratio will be reduced to 50%; it seems that it will take 3 years. If you leave, the overalls will be sent to you..." Chen said, as she was detained, she knew there were five or six. She was fine, because she only got the winter clothes and she had two employees. , was deducted 1,200 yuan.

They also asked the company to issue an invoice, but the company said that the invoice could allow the factory to open, but to deduct the full production fee from the salary, and some employees did not open or even pass through after getting the overalls and wanted to return, but the suit Jackets, pants, and skirts can't be retired...

In this regard, Chen is full of complaints: "Where can companies have to force employees to pay for the cost of work clothes? When they join the company, they don't explain clearly and they haven't signed any agreements until they leave the company, telling us to pay for the money themselves. It's not high, but it's so depressing. It's really depressing."

The company said no problem

Work full year clothing free gift

It has been explained when making work clothes

Yesterday afternoon, a media spokesperson of the company received an interview with reporters about the complaints of the resigned employees.

The spokesperson stated that because the company has some business related to finance and overseas markets, employees are required to wear uniforms. Therefore, in July and August last year, uniforms began to be unified. He told reporters that although the content of overalls was not included in the labor contract (the uniform was not yet available at the time), the OA (office) system and the company's work group had corresponding explanations when making overalls.

“This content related to the work clothes management system shows that if the work time is less than one year, the production costs of the work clothes that the employees need to bear can be priced at discretion; if the work is completed for one year, the clothes are provided free of charge. At the time of size, our personnel and administrative departments have explained the employees."

"Although the pricing was stipulated as appropriate, how much did the specific company bear and how much did the employee bear?

"Yes, the ratio is now set," he said.

Lawyer

Lawyer: Should not be covered by staff

Whether the company's practice can get legal support? Yesterday afternoon, the reporter consulted with Prof. Shi Sitao of Beijing Weiheng (Ningbo) Law Firm. He has a negative opinion on this.

According to Article 9 of the "Labor Contract Law", "employers hire workers and must not collect property from workers in other names." Therefore, the practice of collecting work clothes, clothing, or work clothes is Violation of this legal provision.

Second, from the legal theory to analyze: If the overalls must be used in the work process, the work clothes are the necessary working conditions, the unit must be provided free of charge; if the overalls are not required to use, but for the company's mental outlook and the company Culture, in this case, the company also benefits from working clothes, and the company should also bear the corresponding costs.

Therefore, whether it is from the legal or jurisprudential point of view, the company's practice is wrong.